This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Esqueda, C. W. Articles by Culhane, S. E. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Effects of Ethnicity, SES, and Crime Status on Juror Decision Making

A Cross-Cultural Examination of Euopean American and Mexican American Mock Jurors

University of Nebraska, Lincoln, cwillis-esqueda1{at}unl.edu

Russ K. E. Espinoza

California State University, Fullerton

Scott E. Culhane

University of Wyoming

In two studies, a defendant's ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and crime status were varied for effects on verdict decisions, sentencing recommendations, culpability assignments, and trait assessments. In Study 1, European Americans (N = 221) provided a low SES Mexican American defendant with more guilt verdicts, a lengthier sentence, and higher culpability ratings, compared to a high SES Mexican American or a European American defendant, regardless of crime status. Higher negative trait ratings occurred for a low SES Mexican American who committed a low status crime. In Study 2, Mexican Americans (N = 136) showed no differences for guilt verdicts, recommended sentence, or culpability assignment. These findings demonstrate that European American bias toward Mexican Americans may operate in all phases of the legal process, and future research should address specific contexts where bias applies.

Key Words: juror decision making • ethnicity • crime status • Mexican American jurors • Euro-American jurors • defendant's socioeconomic status • legal process

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?