Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Del Pilar, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Udasco, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Marginality Theory: The Lack of Construct Validity

Jose A. Del Pilar

Empire State College, State University of New York

Jocelynda O. Udasco

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

The 75-year history of marginality theory is reviewed and evaluated, leading to the recommendation that the use of the marginality idea be discarded by social scientists because it lacks construct validity. A review of the literature reveals that, at present, the concept of marginality is employed in five different social science lines of investigation. These models are examined fromthe perspective of their contribution to the validity of the construct and are found wanting. Marginality is shown to be a concept that did not fulfill its promise of explaining the effects on people of immigration, culture clash, and other transitional situations, such as status, role, or class changes. Evidence is presented that marginality is unscientifically founded and has been applied so indiscriminately as to be useless in the social sciences.

Key Words: marginality • Hispanics • construct validity • acculturation • minority and ethnic groups

Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 1, 3-15 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0739986303261813


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
M. A. Gutierrez, L. M. Franco, K. Gilmore Powell, N. A. Peterson, and R. J. Reid
Psychometric Properties of the Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans--II: Exploring Dimensions of Marginality Among a Diverse Latino Population
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, August 1, 2009; 31(3): 340 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Hispanic Higher EducationHome page
J. A. Del Pilar
Mental Health and Latino/a College Students: A Psychological Perspective and New Findings
Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, July 1, 2009; 8(3): 263 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
A. M. Padilla
Bicultural Social Development
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, November 1, 2006; 28(4): 467 - 497.
[Abstract] [PDF]