Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernal, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Valencia, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 4, 540-556 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0739986300224010

The TAAS Case: A Recapitulation and Beyond

Ernesto M. Bernal

University of Texas, Pan American

Richard R. Valencia

The University of Texas at Austin

The authors organize this article around five areas of discussion: First is a recapitulation of the major issues germane to the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills case. Next, the authors discuss the second wave of standards-based school reform in Texas, embodied in Senate Bill 4, pending legislation that would eliminate social promotion and institutionalize retention at several promotional gates for students who fail the state-mandated achievement test. The third section discusses a development at the federal level that could have profound effect on limiting the use of high-stakes tests in standards-based school reform movement in the United States. The fourth part, addressed to psychometricians and policy makers, reviews some of the lessons learned about state-mandated testing from the TAAS case. The final section speculates on what the real agenda for the TAAS may be in terms of maintaining the general social and economic value of the high school diploma at the expense of nondominant racial/ethnic students.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
J. Gayles
Race, Reward, and Reform: An Implicative Examination of the Florida School Recognition Program
Educational Policy, July 1, 2007; 21(3): 439 - 456.
[Abstract] [PDF]