Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saucedo, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 4, 411-422 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0739986300224003

The Legal Issues Surrounding the TAAS Case

Leticia M. Saucedo

Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund

This article provides an overview of the legal claims made by plaintiffs challenging the State’s required passage of the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) exit-level test for graduation in GI Forum et al. v. Texas Education Agency et al. The plaintiffs filed their case alleging that the State’s graduation requirement violated minority students’ equal protection and due process rights as well as Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Educational Opportunity Act. Part 1 of the article summarizes the plaintiffs’ initial complaint and the effect of the court’s pretrial orders on the plaintiffs’ ability to introduce crucial expert evidence to support a pattern of discriminatory State educational policies. Part 2 of the article describes the role of the expert testimony provided at trial for the plaintiffs’ claims and also provides lessons for future litigation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
R. R. Valencia and E. M. Bernal
An Overview of Conflicting Opinions in the TAAS Case
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, November 1, 2000; 22(4): 423 - 444.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
R. R. Valencia
Inequalities and the Schooling of Minority Students in Texas: Historical and Contemporary Conditions
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, November 1, 2000; 22(4): 445 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]