This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gump, L. S. Articles by Roll, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Cultural and Gender Differences in Moral Judgment: A Study of Mexican Americans and Anglo-Americans

Richard C. Baker

California School of Professional Psychology–San Diego

Samuel Roll

University of New Mexico

Kohlberg’s theory of moral development regards justice concerns as developmentally more advanced than interpersonal considerations. Men tend to score as more morally developed than women on existing measures. Gilligan suggested that this is because women rely more on "care" considerations in moral dilemmas, whereas men rely more on "justice" issues. Snarey noted similar bias in the cross-cultural realm. The authors studied moral judgment in Mexican American (n = 40) and Anglo-American (n = 40) college students. On the care measure, as expected, females scored higher than males (p < .05), and Mexican Americans scored higher than Anglo-Americans (p < .01) Contrary to expectation, no differences were obtained on the justice measure. The role of socialization in moral development is discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C. Rodriguez and D. Morrobel A Review of Latino Youth Development Research and a Call for an Asset Orientation Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, May 1, 2004; 26(2): 107 - 127. [Abstract] [PDF]