This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Miranda, J. P. Articles by Valencia, R. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

English and Spanish Versions of a Memory Test: Word-Length Effects Versus Spoken-Duration Effects

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital, Gonzales, Texas

Richard R. Valencia

The University of Texas at Austin

This article offers a methodological strategy to examine cross-language equivalence for tests measuring short-term memory (STM). The test used is the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (English version, RAVLT-E) and a Spanish translation (RAVLT-S). Two units of analysis to examine comparability were used: "word-length" (as measured by syllable count) and "spoken duration." The participants were bilingual, Mexican American, male, college students. Although the word-length was considerably shorter in English than Spanish, the participants'performance on the RA VLT-Eand the RAVLT-S was not significantly different. Spoken duration quantification was not different between the two test versions. STM researchers and test developers need to be cautious about concluding, a priori, that translated Spanish STM tests (due to greater syllabic count) are inherently inequivalent to their English versions. It is recommended that both units of analysis-word length and spoken duration-be examined in such research.

Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 2, 171-181 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/07399863970192005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?