Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magafia, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rulnick, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 4, 444-468 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/07399863960184002

Revisiting the Dimensions of Acculturation: Cultural Theory and Psychometric Practice

J. Raul Magafia

University of California, Irvine

Olivia de la Rocha

California State University, Long Beach

Jaime Amsel

Holly A. Magafia

University of California, Irvine

M. Isabel Fernandez

University of Miami School of Medicine

Sarah Rulnick

L.A. County Department of Health Services

Although acculturation has frequently been employed as an organizing principle in social science research, there remains a lack of clarity regarding "the dimensions of acculturation. " The confusion arises from failure to distinguish between two technical meanings of the term dimension. This study differentiates the dimensionality of the various domains of behavior, values, and preferences (latent constructs) assessed in most measures of acculturation from the dimensionality associated with the way measures of acculturation are scored. Scoring reflects acculturation theory insofar as it suggests whether acculturation is conceptualized as unidimensional movementfrom native to host culture or allows for retention of the native culture as well, that is, biculturalism. Implications of the second meaning of dimension are explored by examining the importance of the way acculturation instruments are scored. Unidimensional and bidimensional scoring systems are differentiated, and a secondary analysis of data is presented to demonstrate the utility of bidimensional scoring.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
A. M. Yamada, R. Valle, C. Barrio, and D. Jeste
Selecting an Acculturation Measure for Use With Latino Older Adults
Research on Aging, September 1, 2006; 28(5): 519 - 561.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
S. Bauman
The Reliability and Validity of the Brief Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II for Children and Adolescents
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, November 1, 2005; 27(4): 426 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
L. J. Cabassa
Measuring Acculturation: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, May 1, 2003; 25(2): 127 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
C. McQuiston and J. H. Flaskerud
"If They Don't Ask About Condoms, I Just Tell Them": A Descriptive Case Study of Latino Lay Health Advisers' Helping Activities
Health Educ Behav, February 1, 2003; 30(1): 79 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
J. L. Jasinski
The Role of Acculturation in Wife Assault
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, May 1, 1998; 20(2): 175 - 191.
[Abstract]