Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mufioz, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Starkweather, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 2, 194-208 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/07399863950172004

Automated Screening for Depression: Toward Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Uses of Computerized Speech Recognition

Ricardo F. Mufioz

Gerardo M. Gonzfilez

John Starkweather

University of California, San Francisco

The feasibility of using computers with speech recognition capability in screening for depression was examined. Computerized and written forms of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale were administered to 19 Spanish-speaking and 19 English-speaking primary care medical patients (n = 38) at a hospital-based outpatient depression clinic. A counterbalanced experimental design was employed to randomly assign the order of administration to the language groups. Psychometric analyses of the two methods suggested that the two forms were highly equivalent in both languages. There were no significant differences in the means and variances of the two forms. Ranked-order correlations and coefficient alpha estimates for interitem consistency were high. The two methods were found to be acceptable in equal proportionsfor both language groups, with a tendency to prefer the computerized method.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
G. M. Gonzalez, C. Carter, and E. Blanes
Bilingual Computerized Speech Recognition Screening for Depression Symptoms: Comparing Aural and Visual Methods
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, May 1, 2007; 29(2): 156 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]