Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peregoy, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, O. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 1, 35-47 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/07399863910131003

Second Language Oral Proficiency Characteristics of Low, Intermediate, and High Second Language Readers

Suzanne F. Peregoy

San Francisco State University

Owen F. Boyle

San Jose State University

Investigating relationships between second language (L2) oral proficiency and reading, this study examined differences between low, intermediate, and high L2 readers on four L2 oral language variables. Subjects were 57 native Spanish-speaking third-grade children, who began learning English as a second language after entering kindergarten. Subjects were divided into three groups according to their performance on a diagnostic reading test: low, intermediate, and high L2 readers. L2 oral proficiency was individually assessed using an interactive, simulated science lesson. Resulting oral language samples were rated on four variables: grammatical complexity, well-formedness, informativeness, and comprehension. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to detect significant differences among the three groups. Post hoc pairwise comparisons were then made, using the Mann-Whitnney U to test for significance. Results indicated significant differences on all four oral language variables between the low and high L2 readers. In addition, differences between the intermediate and high groups were significant for well-formedness and informativeness. Results are discussed in terms of a theory of general second language proficiency encompassing both oral and written language.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?